Obamamath: 100-30 = 95?

I was reading an article about Obama's tax plan and got so frustrated that I needed a forum in which to vent. When you hear the Obama talking pieces on the news or associates who are so eager to be ignorant as to the most simplistic economic principles, ask yourself the following question. If 30% of people in America pay no income tax, how will 95% of Americans receive a tax break? You cannot get a tax break if you pay no taxes. Obama's campaign is, at best, parsing words when they use tax break. More realistically they are using an outright lie to deceive those who are too uneducated or apathetic to form a cogent thought. What the campaign is promising is a break alright, they are promising to break off a piece of other people's paychecks and 'redistribute the wealth' with no requirement on how or where the money is spent (not that that makes stealing other people's money okay). After the initial outcry the Obama campaign has made some superficial modifications to the plan, but still, it is in essence Marxism. That's right, I said it...MARXISM. If you deny it it is because you do not understand what Marxism is, or you want it and are afraid that if you are found out then the most unqualified candidate in the history of theses United States would lose in a route. The idea that 95% of people receive a tax cut is so absurd that anyone who believes it should be placed in the stocks in town square. Worse yet, if someone believes this they deserve to experience the economic crisis that an Obama administration will bring. Dick Morris, former Bill Clinton top advisor explained how the Clinton administration was able to balance the budget. He explained that neither increased taxes nor social programs got them any closer. It was when the administration decided to cut capital gains taxes from 28% down to 20% that the budget finally moved and eventually balanced. Under the George W. Bush tax cuts the government saw over 300 billion dollars in increased revenues---by cutting taxes, not raising them you idiot liberals. Under Jimmy Carter, Obama's mentor, the raising of taxes caused unemployment to surpass 10%, inflation over 20%, and shortages on gasoline. For the love of Buddah, a freaking misery index had to be created to gauge how miserable people were during that era! How many times must you be run over by the intellectually inferior bus before you decide to get out of the way? The valid criticisms of the current administration is that it has acted like one of those liberal pedestrians in the path of the stupid bus. The spending of this administration only elucidates the point that Obama should not only not be near any elected office, but also his own wife should make sure he does not have access to their personal checking accounts.
In all fairness, Barack Obama does not form his policy, he is any empty suit, a cipher who his staff has successfully absconded from public scrutiny. His own ideas are too idiotic to get him into the president's office, so they have made up some temporary views according to what people want to hear. This is why he was, for so long, such an inept public speaker, he had no idea what he was espousing. Unfortunately for clear thinking people across America, he got a handle on his temporary philosophies in time for the debates and actually sounded like he believed the garbage to which he had suddenly become a convert. An Obama victory on November fourth means one thing and one thing only. That is that the diluted, dishonest, disingenuous, and delusional will have become the voting majority. I am afraid for the reality check this country will face when that sad majority finds that Obama will not provide everyone a magical flying unicorn that will carry them to the end of the rainbow where they will find their own personal pot of leprechaun gold.